AI and the Future of Writing

A roundtable of authors discuss the ramifications for art—and life.

ON APRIL 8, at Yale University, Ayad Akhtar, Daniel Kehlmann and Meghan O’Rourke, three writers at the vanguard of creative engagement with AI, gathered with James Surowiecki, a journalist and senior editor at The Yale Review, to talk about AI and the future of the humanities. The following conversation ranged across the social ramifications of the LLM era, from changes in our cognition to shifting notions about the nature of language itself. The transcript has been edited and condensed for clarity and concision.

JAMES SUROWIECKI I want to start with a really big question, but Meghan suggested that might not be the best way in. So I’ll start by easing in. Can you describe your relationship to AI at the moment?

MEGHAN O’ROURKE That is not a small question.

DANIEL KEHLMANN It’s a great question, and it’s very hard to answer. It’s not a stable relationship, because I’m still in the process of finding out what AI is and what it can do. It can be extremely helpful and utterly amazing. And, at the same time, most of us will agree that it is very dangerous. It’s very hard to have a stable inner relationship to something like that.

To read the full article on yalereview.org, click here